Basemarks Duluth, Georgia

The scan

What a DEXA scan actually measures.

Everything below is sourced. Where we give a number — precision, radiation dose, how it compares to a smart scale — you can follow it to the literature it came from.

The short version

DEXA stands for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The scanner passes two low-energy X-ray beams through your body. Fat, lean soft tissue and bone each absorb those two energies in a different and predictable ratio, so the machine can work out how much of each is present — and, critically, where.

That last part is what separates DEXA from almost everything else. You do not get a single body fat number. You get fat, lean mass and bone reported separately for each arm, each leg, and your trunk.

What this is not. Basemarks provides body composition and bone density measurement for wellness and fitness purposes. A scan here is not a diagnostic test, and it does not replace advice from your physician. We explain the limits of what a whole-body scan can tell you further down this page, because we would rather you know them in advance.

The four things it tells you

1. Body fat percentage — measured, not inferred

Most consumer body fat numbers are estimates derived from a proxy. A smart scale or handheld device uses bioelectrical impedance: it runs a small current through you and infers fat from the resistance it meets. Because that resistance depends heavily on how much water is in your body, the reading moves with hydration, recent meals, recent exercise and even skin temperature.5

DEXA is not inferring from a proxy. It measures the attenuation of two X-ray energies through the tissue itself, which is why it is treated as the practical reference method for body composition outside a research lab.1

2. Lean mass, region by region

Your report breaks lean tissue out by limb. Left arm against right, legs against trunk. This is the measurement people find most immediately useful and it is the one a scale physically cannot give you — asymmetry after an injury, or whether a training block actually added tissue to the muscles you were training.

Appendicular lean mass — the lean tissue in your four limbs, indexed to your height — is also the measurement clinicians use when they want to track muscle over the long term, because it is the part of your lean mass least confounded by organ tissue and fluid.2

3. Visceral fat

Visceral adipose tissue is the fat packed around the organs in your abdomen, as opposed to the subcutaneous fat directly under your skin. It is the deposit most consistently associated with metabolic risk, and you cannot see it or pinch it — people at a perfectly ordinary weight can carry a great deal of it.

DEXA estimates visceral fat from the android region of the scan. It is a very good non-invasive approximation of what a CT or MRI would show, without the dose or the cost of either.3

4. Bone mineral density

A whole-body scan reports one bone mineral density figure averaged across your entire skeleton. Tracked over years, it is a genuinely useful baseline — most people have never had one taken and have no idea what their starting point was.

Be clear about what this figure is, though. It is not the same test as a dedicated hip and lumbar spine study, and it is not interchangeable with one. See the limits section.

How it compares to everything else

The honest summary: every method here has a defensible use. They differ mostly in how much they move when nothing about you has actually changed — which is the only property that matters if you intend to measure yourself more than once.

Typical characteristics of common body composition methods. Precision figures describe repeatability under controlled conditions and vary by operator, device and population.145
Method What it measures Regional detail Main weakness
DEXA Fat, lean tissue and bone, measured separately Yes — per limb and trunk Small radiation dose; results not identical across manufacturers
Bioimpedance (smart scale, handheld) Estimates fat from electrical resistance Limited, and modelled rather than measured Moves substantially with hydration, food and exercise
Bod Pod (air displacement) Estimates fat from body volume and density No — whole body only Assumes fixed tissue densities; sensitive to clothing, hair and breathing
Hydrostatic weighing Estimates fat from body density underwater No — whole body only Requires a full exhale underwater; residual lung volume is a large error source
Skinfold calipers Estimates fat from subcutaneous thickness at set sites Only where measured Highly operator-dependent; cannot see visceral fat at all
3D optical / photo apps Estimates fat from body shape Shape only Predicting internal composition from an outline; cannot measure bone

Why repeatability is the whole game

Suppose you train hard for twelve weeks and gain two pounds of muscle while losing four pounds of fat. That is an excellent outcome, and it is roughly a two percentage point shift in body fat.

A method that can swing three or four points depending on whether you drank coffee that morning cannot see that result. It will show you noise and you will not be able to tell it apart from signal. DEXA's repeat-scan precision for total body fat percentage is typically well under one percentage point,4 which is what makes a twelve-week comparison meaningful rather than decorative.

This is also why we will nag you about scanning under consistent conditions. The machine's precision is only useful if you do not throw it away by scanning fasted in March and after lunch in June.

The radiation question, with real numbers

People ask about this more than anything else, and most operators answer with a food analogy and no source. Here are the actual figures.

Published effective doses for whole-body DEXA composition scans on modern scanners fall in the range of roughly 1 to 10 microsieverts (µSv), depending on the machine, the scan mode and your body size.6 Some newer scanners and fast modes sit at the very bottom of that range.

Approximate effective doses for context. Individual exposures vary considerably with equipment, technique and body size.67
Source Approximate effective dose
Whole-body DEXA composition scan~1–10 µSv
Natural background radiation, US average~3,100 µSv per year, or roughly 8.5 µSv per day
Chest X-ray (single view)~20–100 µSv
Abdominal CT scan~8,000 µSv

Read the second row again, because it is the one that puts the first row in perspective. The average person in the United States receives about 3.1 millisieverts a year from natural background sources alone — cosmic rays, radon, the potassium in their own body.7 A whole-body composition scan is comparable to somewhere between a few hours and about a day of ordinary existence.

Low is not the same as zero. That is exactly why the screening questionnaire exists rather than being a formality. DEXA scanning is not appropriate during pregnancy or if there is any possibility you may be pregnant, and it should be postponed after a procedure involving contrast dye, barium or a radioactive tracer.

What a DEXA scan cannot tell you

Most sites in this category do not have a section like this. We would rather you hear it from us than be surprised by it.

  • It is not a diagnosis of anything. Your report is a set of measurements. Interpreting them in the context of your medical history is your physician's job, not ours.
  • A whole-body scan is not a bone density study. It gives a single skeleton-wide average. The clinical assessment of bone density is performed at the hip and lumbar spine specifically, because those sites are the most predictive of fracture risk, and it produces site-specific scores that a whole-body average cannot substitute for.8 If bone is your actual concern, tell us, and we will point you to the right test rather than sell you the wrong one.
  • Results are not perfectly portable between machines. Scanners from different manufacturers, and even different software versions, can produce systematically different absolute values.1 Compare your scans to your own previous scans on the same machine. A number from a different studio is a rough reference, not a like-for-like baseline.
  • It does not measure fitness. Body composition says nothing directly about your cardiovascular capacity or your metabolic rate. Those are different tests.
  • Very large or very tall people may not fit the scan field. There are established workarounds, but tell us in advance so the appointment goes smoothly.

Who actually benefits from one

Honestly? Anyone who intends to change something and wants to know whether it worked. In practice the people who get the most out of it are:

  • Anyone losing weight who wants to confirm they are losing fat rather than muscle — the single most common and most expensive mistake in dieting.
  • Anyone on a GLP-1 medication, for the same reason, with more urgency.
  • Lifters and athletes tracking whether a training block produced tissue where it was aimed.
  • Anyone over forty who wants a bone and lean mass baseline while it is still early enough for the number to be useful.
  • Anyone whose bloodwork looks fine but who wants to know about visceral fat, which weight and waist size both approximate poorly.

Get opening updates How to prepare →

References

  1. Shepherd JA, Ng BK, Sommer MJ, Heymsfield SB. “Body composition by DXA.” Bone, 2017;104:101–105.
  2. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, et al. “Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis.” Age and Ageing, 2019;48(1):16–31. (Source of the appendicular lean mass index convention.)
  3. Kaul S, et al. “Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for quantification of visceral fat.” Obesity, 2012;20(6):1313–1318.
  4. Toombs RJ, Ducher G, Shepherd JA, De Souza MJ. “The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition.” Obesity, 2012;20(1):30–39.
  5. Ward LC. “Bioelectrical impedance analysis for body composition assessment: reflections on accuracy, clinical utility, and standardisation.” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2019;73:194–199.
  6. Damilakis J, Adams JE, Guglielmi G, Link TM. “Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis.” European Radiology, 2010;20(11):2707–2714.
  7. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Report No. 160: Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. NCRP, 2009.
  8. International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Official Positions — Adult. ISCD. (Basis for site-specific hip and lumbar spine assessment.)

Opening soon

Want to know when we open?

We're opening in Duluth, Georgia. Leave your email and we'll tell you the day booking goes live.

We'll only use your address to tell you when we open. No health information is collected on this page. Prefer email? Write to hello@basemarks.health.